PREFACE
Regardless of the issue,
it's quite common for Activists to contradict themselves.
They're often changing their story,
in order to build a strong argument.
Unfortunately, it's difficult to challenge this type of mentality.
Because, there's no definitive subject matter, from which to debate.
Thus, every man struggles to remain committed to a firm position.
But, he must be prepared for a sudden change-of-rules.
For example:
---Women's groups will sometimes declare that 'she's the oppressed'.
---While, other times, they describe themselves as "The Supreme beings".
---Or, they claim that "Men are Violent & evil",
---But, often, they provoke physical and emotional intimidation against boys.
---She also discusses the issue of "bias against women",
---while creating every possible negative stereotype against boys.
But, above all else, they can systematically change their direction,
and, render the previous discussion obsolete.
SO,
she could become physically abusive toward me,
for daring to argue against her.
While, at the same time,
all contrary issues are shelved for later use.
This type of mentality was common, during the 1980's.
Let's reflect upon 'Daytime Talk-shows' from that decade.
Their predominant form of argumentation was to bully others into compliance.
Not only was this unfair and degrading, but
we couldn't even point out the sheer contradictions.
MAIN article:
----
"Divas Etc"
-----
Okay, with that said,
there's one issue which stands above the rest.
Many literary works tell us, that,
Our ancestors worshiped a singular goddess,
and, therefore, matriarchy is clearly the most sensible belief.
In truth, there's no reason to reach such outlandish conclusions.
And, as a matter of fact,
there have always been numerous gods & goddesses.
Also, many artifacts are subject to ones own interpretation.
Most interestingly,
Many historians have begun teaching that,
women actually created civilization.
She supposedly invented all tools,
which launched humanity from the stone age.
This is a foolish notion, for several reasons.
Firstly,
we're not denying that her contributions (as a mother) had equal importance.
But, many Universities teaching us,
that women created all mechanical devices.
(Everything which would normally be associated with the male role).
secondly,
how could they possibly know our past, with such vivid detail ?
and, third.
Theories regarding "Mother nature" are based upon ones own interpretation.
So, if someone examines an ancient fertility figure,
it could either be seen as a supreme goddess,
or, nothing more than a mere gesture of good luck.
Perhaps, neither explanation is freezable.
It could be an example of respect and admiration,
but, not on a spiritual level.
Or, it could be comparable to the modern-day diva,
rather than a supreme goddess.
Indeed, there are many possible answers.
In any case, it was likely given to all,
and not just representing a singular deity.
Now, on a serious note,
Historians speak of a maternal goddess figure.
there's some degree of truth regarding this claim.
Perhaps, ancient societies revered women as divas.
This might very well be true.
But, we needn't accept the reasons given by Liberal educators.
This historical respect is completely unrelated to deities,
such as, Mother Nature.
Instead, the attitude was wide-spread.
And, it pertained to ordinary women, of that time.
In a sense, they were looked upon as divas.
This was greatly due to her role as caregiver.
In other words,
there seems to be a natural respect for feminine attributes.
Whether it be,
motherhood,
sexuality,
child bearing,
or, countless other examples.
Historians also claim, there's a conspiracy to hide the truth.
Ironically, these same activists often contradict their own theories.
In other words:
many fierce arguments claim, that,
"women have been victimized ...since the dawning of time".
SO, here's the usual situation.
No matter which direction they choose upon,
her validity will be upheld.
And, in both cases, the explanations are somewhat extreme.
Sometimes, they say, our ancient past was controlled by Amazonian women.
While, other times, she was totally denied any basic dignity.
Never once does anyone consider a normal conclusion.
This issue has been suppressed, by conspirators ????
Actually, they were replaced by newer icons.
SO, the prehistoric figures were eventually forgotten,
not as part of a grand "cover up".
But instead, through the course of time.
Ironically,
virtually none of the ancient goddess figures were fully discarded.
We still remember, until this very day.
-------------------------
"Parallels Span Millennium"
--------------------------
Now, For a better overall understanding.....
Let's observe a typical relationship, from recent times.
Typically, the male gives tremendous special treatment for the lady.
But, his attitude even strengthens, once she bears a child.
This offers a more rational explanation for these ancient theories.
The truth is alot simpler than anyone could've imagined.
---THE END---
presented by www.mensrights.cc
back to Men's Rights Movement: page 3/ Articles.
MensrightsMovement.net
.........
....
........
...
